From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Credle v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 7, 2021
1:21-CV-4216 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-CV-4216 (LTS)

09-07-2021

JAMARR CREDLE, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

By order dated June 3, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Credle v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 7, 2021
1:21-CV-4216 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Credle v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JAMARR CREDLE, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

1:21-CV-4216 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2021)