From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Creative Constr. Servs. LLC v. Grosz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 25, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-397 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-397

11-25-2013

CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM R. GROSZ, Defendant.


Judge Thomas M. Rose


ENTRY AND ORDER DISMISSING CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION'S

COMPLAINT

This matter is now before the Court for a sua sponte review of the Complaint naming Creative Construction Services, LLC as the Plaintiff. While a reading of the Complaint raises several procedural issues, the most important to first consider is this Court's jurisdiction.

The "Subject Matter Jurisdiction" section of the Complaint reads "DISSOLUTION AVOIDANCE CONSENT AND INJUNCTION FOR ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO OTHER STATUTES 896 ARBITRATION IN THIS COURT." Further, the Complaint appears to describe a dispute that is based upon Ohio law and has already been in Ohio state courts. Thus, this Court is unable to determine that it has the power to adjudicate the Complaint and must, therefore, dismiss the Complaint.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio this Twenty-Fifth day of November, 2013.

________

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Creative Constr. Servs. LLC v. Grosz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 25, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-397 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Creative Constr. Servs. LLC v. Grosz

Case Details

Full title:CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM R. GROSZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Nov 25, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-397 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 25, 2013)