From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craycraft v. Warden, Hocking Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 6, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv89 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv89 (WOB-MRM)

11-06-2014

JEREMIAH CRAYCRAFT PETITIONER v. WARDEN, HOCKING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by petitioner (Doc. 24 and 28), and the Court being sufficiently advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the objections (Doc. 24 and 28) to the Report and Recommendations and Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and hereby are, overruled. The Report and Recommendations and the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 20 and 26) be, and hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 2), is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is granted a certificate of appealability on the one ground for relief he pleads.

This 6th day of November, 2014.

Signed By:

William O. Bertelsman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Craycraft v. Warden, Hocking Corr. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 6, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv89 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Craycraft v. Warden, Hocking Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:JEREMIAH CRAYCRAFT PETITIONER v. WARDEN, HOCKING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 6, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv89 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2014)