From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 6, 2000
19 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76688.

June 6, 2000.

APPEAL FROM: CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. SHERRI SULLIVAN.

S. Paige Canfield, Office of the Public Defender, 1221 Locust, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J. and Paul J. Simon and James R. Dowd, JJ.



ORDER


Gregory Crawford, defendant, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant contends the motion court erred in denying his motion, alleging that his counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate and elicit testimony from Officer Brown and Antonio Crawford, witnesses who would have allegedly provided appellant with a defense.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Crawford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 6, 2000
19 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Crawford v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY CRAWFORD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 6, 2000

Citations

19 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)