From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1996
226 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Notwithstanding the defendants' failure to offer "good cause" for their failure to timely settle an order ( 22 NYCRR 202.48 [b]) reflecting the court's decision dismissing the complaint for failure to establish a prima facie case, under the facts of this case the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to deem the defendants' motion, which was to dismiss the complaint, to have been abandoned. "A contrary result would not bring the `repose to court proceedings' ( Hickson v. Gardner, 134 A.D.2d 930, 931; Persaud v. Goriah, 143 Misc.2d 225) that 22 NYCRR 202.48 was designed to effectuate, and would waste judicial resources" ( Russo v. City of New York, 206 A.D.2d 355, 356). Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1996
226 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Crawford v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:LORIS CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. DAWN M. SIMMONS et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 528

Citing Cases

Vincente v. LM Dev., L.L.C.

It is within the sound discretion of the trial court to accept a belated order or judgment for settlement (…

Solomon v. Burden

plaintiffs' motion, excusing the plaintiffs' failure to submit some of the supporting documents the court…