From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Saul

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2021
18 CIVIL 462 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 462 (AEK)

06-15-2021

MAKEBA CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated June 15, 2021, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Carr v. Saul, 141 S.Ct. 1352 (2021), in which the Court held that a claimant need not raise an Appointments Clause claim before the Social Security Administration, but may instead present it for the first time in federal court. On remand, the case will be assigned to a different administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to further evaluate plaintiffs claims, plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a hearing, and the ALJ will issue a new decision.


Summaries of

Crawford v. Saul

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2021
18 CIVIL 462 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Crawford v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MAKEBA CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

18 CIVIL 462 (AEK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2021)