From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 11, 2015
CASE NO. ED CV 14-1535-AB (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 14-1535-AB (PJW)

08-11-2015

DARRYL PIERRE CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). DATED: August 11, 2015.

/s/_________

ANDRE BIROTTE JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Crawford v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 11, 2015
CASE NO. ED CV 14-1535-AB (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Crawford v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL PIERRE CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 11, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 14-1535-AB (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015)