From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Caddo Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jun 8, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-3198 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 8, 2015)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding that a conclusory allegation that laundering of underwear caused "rashes, bumps, and infections" was de minimis injury

Summary of this case from Howard v. Barney
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-3198 SECTION P

06-08-2015

LESLIE DEVONTE CRAWFORD, JR. LA. DOC #334015 v. CADDO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ET AL.

JUDGE STAGG

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's civil rights complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1915 and 11915A.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this judgment to the Keeper of the Three Strikes List.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 8th day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

TOM STAGG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Summaries of

Crawford v. Caddo Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jun 8, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-3198 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 8, 2015)

finding that a conclusory allegation that laundering of underwear caused "rashes, bumps, and infections" was de minimis injury

Summary of this case from Howard v. Barney

finding no Eighth Amendment injury despite plaintiff's allegations that he "received boxer shorts with feces stains in the rear and unidentifiable stains in front" that caused "jock-itch serious enough to cause bleeding"

Summary of this case from Passmore v. Josephson

rejecting inmate claim that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated because he was distributed "dirty or contaminated" t-shirts, towels, underwear and socks finding that the "inconvenience" of dirty laundry was merely a de minimis imposition

Summary of this case from Brown v. Jones

rejecting inmate claim that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated because he was distributed "dirty or contaminated" t-shirts, towels, underwear and socks finding that the "inconvenience" of dirty laundry was merely a de minimis imposition

Summary of this case from Stipe v. Butler
Case details for

Crawford v. Caddo Corr. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE DEVONTE CRAWFORD, JR. LA. DOC #334015 v. CADDO CORRECTIONAL CENTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Jun 8, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-3198 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

Stipe v. Butler

Although the plaintiff complains that the laundry machines were sometimes over-stuffed by the assigned inmate…

Passmore v. Josephson

1. Sufficiently Serious The Seventh Circuit has not expressly addressed whether the issuance of dirty…

5 Citing Cases