Craver v. Hasty

Full title: ANDRE CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. J. HASTY, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 26, 2015

2:11-cv-1344 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2015)

Opinion

ANDRE CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. J. HASTY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-1344 TLN KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. August 26, 2015

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On June 17, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 17, 2015, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for federal protection (ECF No. 131) is denied.