From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craven v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 12, 1993
624 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-1381.

October 12, 1993.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County; Royce Agner, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


In this appeal from judgment and sentence for manufacture of cannabis, possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of paraphernalia, appellant contends he was ineffectively represented at trial. He argues that this case falls within the narrow exception to the rule that claims of ineffectiveness of counsel are collateral matters which must first be raised on motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1982). We disagree, and affirm without prejudice to raise the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Craven v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 12, 1993
624 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Craven v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE STEVEN CRAVEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 12, 1993

Citations

624 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Rooney v. State

We do not reach that issue here because the effectiveness of Rooney's trial counsel cannot be ascertained on…