From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cravatt v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Apr 20, 1927
113 So. 94 (Fla. 1927)

Opinion

Decision Filed April 20, 1927. Petition for Rehearing denied June 4, 1927.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; A. J. Rose Judge.

Bart A. Riley, for Plaintiff in Error;

McCaskill, Taylor McCaskill, for Defendant in Error.


In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be reversed while Mr. Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that said judgment should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 So.2d Rep. 380, and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 So.2d Rep. 796. Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. ___.

An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.

All concur.


Summaries of

Cravatt v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Apr 20, 1927
113 So. 94 (Fla. 1927)
Case details for

Cravatt v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:C. M. CRAVATT, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. H. PIERSON, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Apr 20, 1927

Citations

113 So. 94 (Fla. 1927)
113 So. 94

Citing Cases

National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional Church

PER CURIAM. — In this case Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the…

Jackson v. State

PER CURIAM. — In this case Mr. Justice STRUM, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD are of the opinion…