From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cratsley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 16, 1994
645 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-00407.

November 16, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Donald C. Evans, Judge.

Mark Wolfe, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Tonja R. Vickers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Barry Cratsley challenges the revocation of his probation in case nos. 89-5191, 89-6111, and 90-6037. He contends that his guilty plea was not freely and voluntarily entered.

In order for the issue of the voluntariness of a plea to be considered on direct appeal, a defendant must have filed a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court. Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cratsley did not do so.

Accordingly, we affirm Cratsley's judgments and sentences in the aforementioned cases without prejudice to his filing a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court.

RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cratsley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 16, 1994
645 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Cratsley v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARRY JOHN CRATSLEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 16, 1994

Citations

645 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Traniello v. State

Traniello's letter to the trial judge, while complaining about various matters, was not sufficient to…