From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0663 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0663 KJM CKD P

03-25-2013

RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, Plaintiff, v. MIKE McDONALD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested a second extension of time to file objections to the February 6, 2013 findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, the court will grant this request. However, plaintiff is cautioned that arguments and/or evidence on matters other than plaintiff's alleged denial of outdoor exercise will be disregarded.

Plaintiff also seeks to modify the December 3, 2012 scheduling order to grant him until April 22, 2013 to file a motion to compel discovery. Good cause appearing, the court will so modify the order. However, the period in which to serve discovery requests has closed and will not be reopened. (See Dkt. No. 59.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 61) is granted;

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve objections to the findings and recommendations. No further extensions will be granted; and

3. Plaintiff may file a motion to compel discovery no later than April 22, 2013.

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Crane v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0663 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Crane v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, Plaintiff, v. MIKE McDONALD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0663 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)