From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crandle v. Sims

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2020
CA 16-0550-MU (S.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2020)

Opinion

CA 16-0550-MU

09-01-2020

JAMES DELESTER CRANDLE, Plaintiff, v. C.O. SIMS, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff James Delester Crandle have and take nothing from Defendants La'Tre Thompson and Ta'Eric Sims and that Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment excessive use of force and failure to intervene claim(s) against Sims and Thompson be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Crandle has failed to establish the violation of any constitutional right, and Defendants are thus entitled to qualified immunity.

DONE this the 1st day of September, 2020.

P. Bradley Murray

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Crandle v. Sims

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 1, 2020
CA 16-0550-MU (S.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2020)
Case details for

Crandle v. Sims

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DELESTER CRANDLE, Plaintiff, v. C.O. SIMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 1, 2020

Citations

CA 16-0550-MU (S.D. Ala. Sep. 1, 2020)