From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cramer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 1, 2008
249 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 89827.

April 1, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marion County, John Jackson, Judge.

Irene Karns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.



ORDER


Anthony Cramer appeals the judgment affirming his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that the evidence did not support a defense to first degree assault of acting under the influence of sudden passion arising from adequate cause.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cramer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 1, 2008
249 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Cramer v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony CRAMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Apr 1, 2008

Citations

249 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)