Cramer v. Horowitz

Full title: LORENZO CRAMER, Plaintiff, v. EVALYN HOROWITZ, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 24, 2015

2:14-cv-1472-TLN-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2015)

Opinion

LORENZO CRAMER, Plaintiff, v. EVALYN HOROWITZ, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-1472-TLN-EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. April 24, 2015

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On February 10, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2015, are adopted in full; and

         2. Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 2) is denied.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.