From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Preston

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1992
593 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-2793.

February 4, 1992. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1992.

Petition from the Circuit Court, Appellate Division, Dade County, Murray Goldman, J.

Ira Pozen and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondents.

Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


Ray C. Craig petitions for a writ of common law certiorari seeking review of a clerk's order dismissing his appeal from the appellate division of the circuit court for failure to timely file his initial brief.

We grant the petition, as "[i]t is an established principle of law that dismissal of an appellate proceeding should be employed sparingly and only after repeated violations or contumacious disregard of a court's orders." Krebs v. State, 588 So.2d 38 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (citations omitted). The order that established the briefing schedule was ambiguous because it was subject to various interpretations. Pursuant to our reading of the order, appellant's brief was timely filed.

Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the order under review, and remand for reinstatement of the appeal.


Summaries of

Craig v. Preston

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 18, 1992
593 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Craig v. Preston

Case Details

Full title:RAY C. CRAIG, PETITIONER, v. LYNETTE N. PRESTON, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 18, 1992

Citations

593 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

United Automobile v. Total Rehab

Based on the foregoing, the great weight of Florida authority holds that the failure to file an initial brief…

Personna v. State

"[D]ismissal of an appellate proceeding should be employed sparingly and only after repeated violations or…