From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Pierson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
2:22-cv-0708 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0708 DB P

01-11-2023

NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, Plaintiff, v. VERNON R. PIERSON, Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

DEBORAH BARNES, UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed November 8, 2022 (ECF No. 5), plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The time period granted has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty (30) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Craig v. Pierson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
2:22-cv-0708 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Craig v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, Plaintiff, v. VERNON R. PIERSON, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-0708 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)