From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:22-cv-1874 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1874 AC P

05-16-2023

MICHAEL A. CRAIG, Plaintiff, v. GENA JONES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 5. In support of the motion, plaintiff states in part that he is indigent; that efforts he made to secure counsel for himself have been unsuccessful, and that he has limited knowledge of the law. Id. at 1-4.

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). Given the facts above, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 5) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Craig v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:22-cv-1874 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Craig v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. CRAIG, Plaintiff, v. GENA JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1874 AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)