From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 7, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-766-JJB (M.D. La. Dec. 7, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-766-JJB

12-07-2011

DALE DWAYNE CRAIG v. BURL CAIN, ET AL


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christine Noland, dated July 21, 2011. (doc. no. 20). Plaintiff has filed an objection; defendant has filed a response.

The court finds that the magistrate judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law are all clearly correct and that there is no need to further address petitioner's arguments. The court agrees with the arguments made by defendant in his response. The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly,

IT !S ORDERED that the petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 7 day of December, 2011.

JAMES J. BRADY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Craig v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Dec 7, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-766-JJB (M.D. La. Dec. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Craig v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:DALE DWAYNE CRAIG v. BURL CAIN, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Dec 7, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-766-JJB (M.D. La. Dec. 7, 2011)

Citing Cases

Osterman v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs

Such a self-serving declaration is inherently unreliable. See Craig v. Cain, 2011 WL 6130594, *5 (M.D. La.…