From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COXE v. BOWMAN

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1928
145 S.E. 921 (N.C. 1928)

Opinion

(Filed 21 November, 1928.)

APPEAL by the plaintiff from Deal, J., at November Term, 1927, of ANSON. No error.

McLendon Covington for plaintiff.

Robinson, Caudle Pruette for defendants.


Plaintiff brought suit to recover damages of the defendants for negligently setting out fire and burning the undergrowth and timber on a tract of land described in the complaint. The defendants filed an answer denying the material allegations set forth in the complaint, and upon the evidence offered at the trial the jury, under the instructions of the court, returned a verdict to the effect that the burning of the plaintiff's land was not caused by the negligence of the defendants. Judgment was rendered upon the verdict and the plaintiff excepted and appealed to this Court.

We have examined the plaintiff's exceptions and have discovered no ground which entitles the plaintiff to a new trial. The controversy was reduced chiefly to matters of fact which were determined by the jury adversely to the plaintiff. The case seems to have been carefully tried and the plaintiff given the advantage of every phase of the law to which he was entitled.

No error.


Summaries of

COXE v. BOWMAN

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1928
145 S.E. 921 (N.C. 1928)
Case details for

COXE v. BOWMAN

Case Details

Full title:FRED J. COXE v. J. C. BOWMAN, C. C. BOWMAN, H. C. GADDY AND D. A…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1928

Citations

145 S.E. 921 (N.C. 1928)
196 N.C. 813