Opinion
No. 20-KH-0657
10-20-2020
ALBERT COX v. DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN
ALBERT COX
VS.
DARRYL VANNOY, WARDEN LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY IN RE: Albert Cox - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Number(s) 15-6462, Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number(s) 20-KH-92; Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JDH
BJJ
JLW
SJC
JTG
WJC
JHB
Supreme Court of Louisiana
October 20, 2020 /s/_________
Clerk of Court
For the Court ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON PER CURIAM:
Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.