COX v. TO WHOM IT CONCERNS

Full title: BRUCE COX, Plaintiff, v. TO WHOM IT CONCERNS, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 22, 2006

Case No. 2:06-CV-567 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 22, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:06-CV-567.

September 22, 2006

ORDER

JOHN HOLSCHUH, Senior District Judge

On August 7, 2006, Magistrate Judge Abel issued an Initial Screening Order granting Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, but recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Record at 4). Plaintiff was notified of his right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, and advised that if he failed to do so within ten days, he would waive his right to a de novo review by the district judge and waive his right to appeal the judgment of the district court.

Plaintiff was served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation by certified mail, but has failed to file any objections within the time allotted. The Court therefore ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Abel's Report and Recommendation, and DISMISSES this case without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.