From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CV 10-611-TUC-FRZ (JCG) (D. Ariz. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 10-611-TUC-FRZ (JCG)

09-28-2011

Bryan Joseph Cox, Petitioner, v. Charles Ryan, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Guerin that recommends denying Petitioner's habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Guerin's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Guerin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Petitioner's §2254 habeas petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter.

Frank R. Zapata

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cox v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 28, 2011
No. CV 10-611-TUC-FRZ (JCG) (D. Ariz. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Cox v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Bryan Joseph Cox, Petitioner, v. Charles Ryan, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. CV 10-611-TUC-FRZ (JCG) (D. Ariz. Sep. 28, 2011)