From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 19, 1969
32 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

June 19, 1969

Appeal from the Onondaga Special Term.

Present — Del Vecchio, J.P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum herein, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Issues are presented in the moving papers not only as to whether the defendants landlords are responsible for code violations on the premises and for a failure to correct them but also as to plaintiffs' own direct responsibility as tenants for their creation and maintenance. As stated in Town of Southeast v. Gonnella ( 26 A.D.2d 550) "In the absence of a clear right to the relief demanded, injunctive relief should not be granted until the issues have been fully explored and the entire matter resolved after plenary trial." In the circumstances presented by the moving papers injunctive relief should not be granted without a resolution of the factual issues on the trial.


Summaries of

Cox v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 19, 1969
32 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Cox v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST COX et al., Respondents, v. CLIFFORD ROGERS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
301 N.Y.S.2d 698

Citing Cases

Town of Porter v. Chem-Trol Pollution Serv

Furthermore, in light of the alleged detrimental effect a delay in the excavation will have upon Chem-Trol's…

Mariculture, Ltd. v. Biggane

Defendants argue that the plaintiff has not demonstrated a strong probability of ultimate success in the main…