From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Nassau Cnty. Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 6, 2013
11-CV-1937 (JFB)(GRB) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

11-CV-1937 (JFB)(GRB)

03-06-2013

JAMAL COX, Plaintiff, v. NASSAU COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:

On April 6, 2011, pro se plaintiff Jamal Cox filed the complaint in this action against defendants Nassau County Correctional Center and Michael Sposato, Sheriff of Nassau County (collectively "defendants").

On September 7, 2011, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff opposed the motion on October 28, 2011, and defendants replied on November 30, 2011. By Order dated October 2, 2012, the Court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Brown for a Report and Recommendation.

On February 15, 2013, Magistrate Judge Brown issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R&R"), recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted, and that plaintiff's claim be dismissed with prejudice. The R&R further instructed that any objections to the R&R be submitted within fourteen (14) days of service of the R&R. (See Report and Recommendation dated February 15, 2013, at 6.) As indicated by the docket sheet, a copy of the R&R was mailed to plaintiff by Magistrate Judge Brown's Chambers on February 15, 2013. (See ECF No. 26.) No objections have been filed to date, although the date for filing any objections has expired.

A district judge may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. See DeLuca v. Lord, 858 F. Supp. 1330, 1345 (S.D.N.Y. 1994); Walker v. Hood, 679 F. Supp. 372, 374 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). As to those portions of a report to which no "specific written objections" are made, the Court may accept the findings contained therein, as long as the factual and legal bases supporting the findings are not clearly erroneous. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); Greene v. WCI Holdings Corp., 956 F. Supp. 509, 513 (S.D.N.Y. 1997).

Having conducted a review of the full record and the applicable law, and having reviewed the R&R for clear error, the Court adopts the findings and recommendations contained in the well-reasoned and thorough R&R in their entirety. Even under a de novo standard, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.

SO ORDERED.

______________

JOSEPH F. BIANCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 6, 2013

Central Islip, New York


Summaries of

Cox v. Nassau Cnty. Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 6, 2013
11-CV-1937 (JFB)(GRB) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Cox v. Nassau Cnty. Corr. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL COX, Plaintiff, v. NASSAU COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

11-CV-1937 (JFB)(GRB) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Leizerovici v. HASC Ctr., Inc.

Likewise, "[c]onclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions are inadequate .…

Leizerovici v. HASC Ctr., Inc.

Likewise, "[c]onclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions are inadequate .…