From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 16, 2023
2:21-cv-01778-DJC-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01778-DJC-JDP (PC)

11-16-2023

ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'' MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants moved for an extension of the deadlines to file a responsive pleading and opposition to Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel in ECF No. 12. Defendants requested to extend the foregoing deadlines by forty-four days, or up to and including December 29, 2023.

The Court has read and considered the motion and finds that good cause exists to grant it.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' request for an extension of time is GRANTED, and the deadlines for Defendants to file responsive pleadings and an opposition to Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel are extended by forty-four days, up to and including December 29, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cox v. Daram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 16, 2023
2:21-cv-01778-DJC-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Cox v. Daram

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST LEE COX, Jr., Plaintiff, v. VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 16, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-01778-DJC-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2023)