Cox v. Bertsch

10 Citing cases

  1. Ballow v. Phico Insurance Company

    878 P.2d 672 (Colo. 1994)   Cited 67 times
    Upholding cost award for expert witness fees and photocopying where trial court expressly found that they were "not inflated due to waste or error, but are reasonable in light of the complexity of this case."

    However, specific performance can only be accomplished according to the terms of the parties' contract. Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889, 892 (Colo.App. 1986); Otis Oil Gas Corp. v. Maier, 284 P.2d 653, 656 (Wyo. 1955). A court may not make a contract for the parties and then order it to be specifically performed.

  2. Mortgage Finance, Inc. v. Podleski

    742 P.2d 900 (Colo. 1987)   Cited 42 times
    Interpreting section 13โ€“21โ€“102, C.R.S.2011 (relating to exemplary damages)

    We note that the court of appeals has also recently interpreted the punitive damages statute contrary to the position set forth by this court with regard to equity actions. In Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986), the court of appeals stated that "in recognition of the merger of law and equity, the modern trend is to allow exemplary damages in addition to equitable relief where injury is caused by a tort." 730 P.2d at 892-93.

  3. Postal Instant Press v. Jackson

    658 F. Supp. 739 (D. Colo. 1987)   Cited 16 times
    Applying Colorado law, the court held that punitive damages are not recoverable under a claim for breach of contract and specifically rejected the court of appeals' reasoning in Podleski v. Mortgage Finance, Inc.

    Id. at 1009, citing Podleski. Finally, the Davies rule was invoked in Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986). In that case, plaintiffs were awarded specific performance of a real estate sales contract and also exemplary damages.

  4. Schreck v. T & C Sanderson Farms, Inc.

    37 P.3d 510 (Colo. App. 2001)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that an option and right of first refusal which set the price at the "appraised value" was sufficiently definite to enforce

    Contracts must be reasonably certain to justify a decree of specific performance. Courts cannot make contracts for parties and then order them specifically performed. Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986). Thus, the indefiniteness of a contract is an adequate reason to refuse specific performance.

  5. King v. Everett

    775 P.2d 65 (Colo. App. 1989)   Cited 4 times

    The trial court's award of exemplary damages here was supported by case law existing when the judgment was entered. Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986). The subsequent invalidation of Cox v. Bertsch and other cases by the supreme court in Mortgage Finance, Inc. v. Podleski, supra, rendered the award of exemplary damages here erroneous but not void within the meaning of C.R.C.P. 60(b)(3).

  6. In re Reinwald v. TRC Co., W.C. No

    W.C. No. 4-622-388 (Colo. Ind. App. Apr. 6, 2006)   Cited 1 times

    Tr. at 5, 8. See Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986); Walker v. Excel Corp. W.C. No. 4-535 (September 24, 2003) (error may not be predicated on ruling which admits evidence unless a timely objection to strike the evidence appears of record). The ALJ determined the amount of the overpayment only to the extent necessary to impose a reasonable penalty, and noted that the delay by the claimant in notifying the insurer of his return to work resulted in the insurer overpaying the claimant's TTD benefits. Under these circumstances, we conclude the issue of overpayment, to the extent necessary to determine what was owed the claimant and its impact on the penalty claims, was sufficiently raised and tried by consent of the parties.

  7. In re Marsak, W.C. No

    W.C. No. 4-416-242 (Colo. Ind. App. May. 13, 2004)   Cited 1 times

    Consequently, the record suggests the issue of authorization for Dr. Palko-Schraa's treatment was tried by consent. Robbolino v. Fischer-White Contractors, 738 P.2d 70 (Colo.App. 1987); Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986). In any case, the respondents dispute the ALJ's finding that Dr. Weber terminated her treatment of the claimant because the claimant violated a controlled substance contract.

  8. In re Walker, W.C. No

    W.C. No. 4-535 (Colo. Ind. App. Sep. 24, 2003)   Cited 1 times

    (Tr. pp. 7, 12, 14). It follows, the issue of whether the claimant's injury was caused by his job duties in the freezer department was tried by consent and the respondent waived any objection to the ALJ's consideration of this evidence. See Robbolino v. Fischer-White Contractors, 738 P.2d 70 (Colo.App. 1987); Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986); C.R.E. 103(a)(1) (error may not be predicated on ruling which admits evidence unless a timely objection to strike the evidence appears of record). We also note that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the ALJ's finding of a causal connection between the employment and the claimant's cervical condition.

  9. In re Eachus, W.C. No

    W.C. Nos. 4-450-980 4-406-492 (Colo. Ind. App. Jun. 25, 2001)

    Under these circumstances, the issue of authorization was tried by consent. See Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986) Ms. Merriam testified the claimant had been treating with Judy Eskelsson, "who is our nurse practitioner, and Judy had referred her to Dr. Dohm."

  10. In re Stilwell, W.C. No

    W.C. No. 4-337-321 (Colo. Ind. App. Jul. 28, 1999)   Cited 9 times

    We are also mindful of the fact that issues may be implicitly tried by consent. See Robbolino v. Fischer-White Contractors, 738 P.2d 70 (Colo.App. 1987); Cox v. Bertsch, 730 P.2d 889 (Colo.App. 1986). However, ยง 8-41-304(4) contemplates a twenty day cure period after notice of an alleged violation.