From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Bal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2023
2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC)

08-30-2023

ERNEST LEE COX, JR., Plaintiff, v. I. BAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 30, 2023, the court found that plaintiff had stated a potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim against defendants Bal, Williams, and Patterson. ECF No. 27. On May 15, 2023, the court dismissed plaintiff's purported claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. ECF No. 29. Defendants have yet to file a responsive motion or pleading.

Accordingly, within 21 days of the date of this order, defendants shall file a motion or pleading in response to plaintiff's first amended complaint.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Cox v. Bal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2023
2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Cox v. Bal

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST LEE COX, JR., Plaintiff, v. I. BAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2023)