From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Bal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC)

05-12-2023

ERNEST LEE COX, JR., Plaintiff, v. I. BAL. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ FOR THE HONORABLE WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 30, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 30, 2023, are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Plaintiff's purported claims under the ADA and RA are DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Cox v. Bal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Cox v. Bal

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST LEE COX, JR., Plaintiff, v. I. BAL. et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 12, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00804-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)