From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 28, 2014
444 S.W.3d 483 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. WD 76178.

2014-10-28

Craig D. COWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cass County, MO, William B. Collins, Judge. Dennis Owens, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Adam Rowley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from Circuit Court of Cass County, MO, William B. Collins, Judge.
Dennis Owens, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Adam Rowley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: GARY D. WITT, P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Mr. Craig D. Coward appeals the judgment denying a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present certain witnesses.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Coward v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 28, 2014
444 S.W.3d 483 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Coward v. State

Case Details

Full title:Craig D. COWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 28, 2014

Citations

444 S.W.3d 483 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)