From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cowans v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 18, 2018
564 S.W.3d 399 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 81277

12-18-2018

Jessuan Lamar COWANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for Appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, for Respondent.


Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, for Respondent.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Lisa White Hardwick, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jessuan Cowans appeals the denial after evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He complains on appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was prejudiced when his trial attorney misinformed him that he would have to serve every day of any sentence imposed for attempted victim tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cowans v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec 18, 2018
564 S.W.3d 399 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Cowans v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jessuan Lamar COWANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Dec 18, 2018

Citations

564 S.W.3d 399 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)