Covington v. Swarthout

Full title: DANNY COVINGTON, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

EDCV 10-1799-AHM (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

DANNY COVINGTON, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent. No. EDCV 10-1799-AHM (RNB) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 8, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied; and (2) Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.