From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Covington v. Chronister

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 7, 2023
4:23-cv-391-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 7, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-cv-391-DPM

11-07-2023

REO L. COVINGTON #533457 PLAINTIFF v. WILLIAM CHRONISTER, Dardenelle Police Officer; DOES 1-4, Dardenelle Police Officers; PEARSON'S TOWING & RECOVERY SERVICES LLC, Towing Services; DARDENELL POLICE DEPARTMENT DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

Covington hasn't paid the $402 administrative and filing fee or filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis; and the time to do so has passed. Doc. 9. His mail is being returned. Doc. 11. His complaint will therefore be dismissed without prejudice. LOCAL RULE 5.5(C)(2). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Covington v. Chronister

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 7, 2023
4:23-cv-391-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Covington v. Chronister

Case Details

Full title:REO L. COVINGTON #533457 PLAINTIFF v. WILLIAM CHRONISTER, Dardenelle…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 7, 2023

Citations

4:23-cv-391-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 7, 2023)