From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Couvertier v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 14, 2020
19-CV-8533 (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 8533 (SN)

10-14-2020

BLANCA I. COUVERTIER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated October 14, 2020, the Commissioner's motion for remand is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and a remand solely for purposes of an award of benefits is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The record "does not compel but one conclusion," and therefore a remand for an award of benefits is not appropriate. Johnson v. Bowen, 817 F.2d 983, 986 (2d Cir. 1987). Accordingly, this matter is remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98 (1991). On remand, the Commissioner will affirm the ALJ's finding that Plaintiff became disabled beginning on April 4, 2018. For the period before April 4, 2018, the Commissioner will direct the ALJ to: (1) further evaluate the opinion of Dr. Mahony along with all other opinion and other medical evidence of record; (2) re-assess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity; and (3) if warranted by the expanded record, obtain vocational expert testimony; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

October 14, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Couvertier v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 14, 2020
19-CV-8533 (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Couvertier v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:BLANCA I. COUVERTIER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Citations

19-CV-8533 (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2020)