From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Couturier v. Am. Invsco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 29, 2017
C/w Case No.: 2:12-cv-01111-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-01104-APG-NJK C/w Case No.: 2:12-cv-01106-APG-NJK C/w Case No.: 2:12-cv-01107-APG-NJK C/w Case No.: 2:12-cv-01108-APG-NJK C/w Case No.: 2:12-cv-01111-APG-NJK

11-29-2017

BRUCE COUTURIER and ELEANOR COUTURIER, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN INVSCO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT REBEKAH DESMET'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant Rebekah Desmet moves for summary judgment, arguing that as an employee of American Invsco Corp. and an agent of Koval Flamingo, LLC, she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law for the same reasons those two defendants were granted judgment. Specifically, Desmet contends she is entitled to the benefit of a release of claims signed by the plaintiffs. In response, the plaintiffs do not dispute that Desmet is an American Invsco employee and a Koval agent within the releases' scope. Instead, they argue the releases are unenforceable.

Desmet also claims she has already been dismissed from cases 2:12-cv-01106-APG-NJK and 2:12-cv-01111-APG-NJK based on the court's March 2014 order. I am uncertain on what basis Desmet believes she has been dismissed from those cases. The March 31, 2014 order denied the defendants' motions to dismiss the conversion claims against Desmet. See Case No. 2:12-cv-01106-APG-NJK, ECF No. 107 at 14-15. Nevertheless, because the plaintiffs do not respond to that argument, and because the same reasoning on the merits applies, I grant summary judgment in Desmet's favor in these cases as well. Desmet is not a defendant in 2:12-cv-01107-APG-NJK. --------

I have already rejected the plaintiffs' arguments about the releases being unenforceable. ECF No. 222. I decline to reconsider that decision. I granted judgment in favor of defendants American Invsco and Koval based on the releases. Id. The plaintiffs released Koval, American Invsco, and their "respective affiliates, shareholders, members, directors, officers, employees and agents . . . ." See, e.g., 197-2 at 4. As it is undisputed Desmet was American Invsco's employee and American Invsco was Koval's agent, the plaintiffs also released their conversion claims against Desmet. I therefore grant Desmet's summary judgment motions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Rebekah Desmet's motions for summary judgment (ECF No. 252 in 2:12-cv-01104-APG-NJK and ECF No. 205 in 2:12-cv-01108-APG-NJK) are GRANTED. Defendant Rebekah Desmet is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the plaintiffs' conversion claims against her in each of the following cases:

2:12-cv-01104-APG-NJK,

2:12-cv-1106-APG-NJK,

2:12-cv-01108-APG-NJK, and

2:12-cv-01111-APG-NJK.

DATED this 29th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Couturier v. Am. Invsco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 29, 2017
C/w Case No.: 2:12-cv-01111-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Couturier v. Am. Invsco

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE COUTURIER and ELEANOR COUTURIER, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN INVSCO, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 29, 2017

Citations

C/w Case No.: 2:12-cv-01111-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2017)