From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cousart v. OpenAI LP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 24, 2024
23-cv-04557-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-04557-VC

05-24-2024

MARILYN COUSART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OPENAI LP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Re: Dkt. No. 52

VINCE CHHABRIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Microsoft's Motion to Compel Arbitration is denied without prejudice. The plaintiffs' complaint contains a significant amount of irrelevant and distracting information, making it difficult to discern what conduct the plaintiffs are alleging Microsoft engaged in that gives rise to potential liability. See Dkt. No. 78. As a result, it is not clear whether the arbitration clause in the Microsoft Services Agreement would, in fact, cover the alleged conduct. Therefore, the motion to compel arbitration is denied without prejudice to Microsoft refiling it once the plaintiffs file an amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cousart v. OpenAI LP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 24, 2024
23-cv-04557-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Cousart v. OpenAI LP

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN COUSART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OPENAI LP, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 24, 2024

Citations

23-cv-04557-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)