From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courville v. Nat'l Freight, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 20, 2012
NO: 09-136 (M.D. La. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

NO: 09-136

03-20-2012

RONALD T. COURVILLE, SR., ET AL. v. NATIONAL FREIGHT, INC., ET AL.


CIVIL ACTION


JUDGE JAY C. ZAINEY


ORDER

Before the Court is a Motion in Limine to Exclude Mike England's Testimony (Rec. Doc. 186) filed by defendant National Freight, Inc. ("NFI"). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. The motion is before the Court on the briefs without oral argument.

Plaintiffs have retained Mike England as their liability expert. NFI moves to exclude England's testimony arguing inter alia that it is irrelevant, based on questionable methodology, and prejudicial.

The motion is DENIED insofar as NFI seeks to exclude England's testimony in its entirety.

The motion is GRANTED insofar as England attempts to opine on Boss's medical condition or to make any comparison between alcoholic intoxication and its similarity or relationship to hypoglycemia or insulin shock. England is clearly not qualified to express such an opinion.

The motion is also GRANTED insofar as England attempts to use references to other accidents, other NFI drivers, or statistics in an attempt to demonstrate that NFI is an unsafe company overall or routinely flouts regulations. This information, which appears to be based on hearsay, is highly prejudicial and irrelevant to the issue of whether NFI acted negligently or in violation of the applicable regulations when hiring Boss. England's testimony will be limited to the alleged violations that impact the question of liability in this case.

Moreover, England will not be allowed to expressly opine that NFI's conduct constituted negligent hiring, negligent re-hiring, negligent supervision, or negligent entrustment of a vehicle. Likewise, England will not be allowed to expressly characterize NFI's conduct as careless or reckless. These legal conclusions are within the sole province of the jury.

Accordingly;

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion in Limine to Exclude Mike England's Testimony (Rec. Doc. 186) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as explained above.

__________________

JAY C. ZAINEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Courville v. Nat'l Freight, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 20, 2012
NO: 09-136 (M.D. La. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Courville v. Nat'l Freight, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD T. COURVILLE, SR., ET AL. v. NATIONAL FREIGHT, INC., ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

NO: 09-136 (M.D. La. Mar. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Travelers Indem. Co.

Therefore, the Court finds it should recommend that this Motion be dismissed without prejudice. See Courville…