Courtsal v. Hartley

Full title: PETE COURTSAL, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Aug 31, 2009

CV 09-95-JVS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2009)

Opinion

PETE COURTSAL, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-95-JVS (AGR) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. August 31, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that (1) Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted; (2) the petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust remedies; and (3) Petitioner's motion to grant petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.