From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courtney v. Young Brothers

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Mar 31, 2004
No. 10-01-00053-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2004)

Opinion

No. 10-01-00053-CV.

Opinion delivered and filed March 31, 2004.

Appeal from the 74th District Court, McLennan County, Texas, Trial Court # 96-3915-3.

Appeal dismissed.

Roderick Courtney, Pro Se; Waco for appellant/relator.

Nich Bray, Naman, Howell, Smith Lee, P.C.; Waco for appellee/respondent.

Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The above cause has been stayed since March 2001 because of a bankrtuptcy proceeding initiated by Appellant. The Court received notice on June 15, 2001, the bankruptcy proceeding was dismissed. The Clerk of this Court notified the parties by letter dated February 26, 2004 that the appeal would be dismissed unless a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal was filed within ten days. No response has been received. Therefore, this appeal is reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution. See Courtney v. City of Waco, 92 S.W.3d 847, 848 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, no pet.).


Summaries of

Courtney v. Young Brothers

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Mar 31, 2004
No. 10-01-00053-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2004)
Case details for

Courtney v. Young Brothers

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK COURTNEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT OF FRIEND OF AMBER COURTNEY, A…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Mar 31, 2004

Citations

No. 10-01-00053-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 31, 2004)

Citing Cases

Kihneman v. Humble Oil Refining Company

The filing of a lawsuit may give rise to an action for malicious prosecution or to an action for defamation,…

Burruss v. Hines

But if the injury was not wanton or malicious, and exemplary damages are not recoverable, the allowance of…