From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courtney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jan 25, 2000
10 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 76350.

January 25, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE EMMETT M. O'BRIEN, JUDGE.

Lisa M. Stroup, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.


ORDER


James Courtney (Movant) appeals the trial court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Courtney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jan 25, 2000
10 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Courtney v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES COURTNEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Jan 25, 2000

Citations

10 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)