From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courtney v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 29, 2014
CIVIL NO. 2:13-CV-72-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 29, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:13-CV-72-DBH

01-29-2014

SALLY MAE COURTNEY, PLAINTIFF v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 30, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on January 16, 2014. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Courtney v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 29, 2014
CIVIL NO. 2:13-CV-72-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Courtney v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:SALLY MAE COURTNEY, PLAINTIFF v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 29, 2014

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:13-CV-72-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 29, 2014)

Citing Cases

Tuttle v. Colvin

In any event, even if the plaintiff had demonstrated that the administrative law judge erred in finding that…

John S. v. Berryhill

Rather, courts treat it as well settled that "the mere fact that an impairment may be 'severe' for purposes…