From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

County of Los Angeles v. Marblehead Land Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Dec 21, 1928
95 Cal.App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)

Opinion

Docket No. 5380.

December 21, 1928.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County taxing costs in an action to condemn land for highway purposes. K.S. Mahon, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Richard Hartley and William J. Clark for Appellants.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, and Hill Morgan for Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASE.


THE COURT.

The defendants having filed their bill of costs and disbursements, the court, on motion duly made, struck from the bill sundry large items, and allowed costs in a greatly reduced sum. From the order so made, the defendants appeal.

[1] The questions of law presented on this appeal are substantially the same as those discussed in City of Los Angeles v. Vickers, 81 Cal.App. 737 [ 254 P. 687], where the principles which apply here are very clearly stated. In accordance with the decision in that case, it is ordered that the order from which defendants appeal be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.


Summaries of

County of Los Angeles v. Marblehead Land Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Dec 21, 1928
95 Cal.App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)
Case details for

County of Los Angeles v. Marblehead Land Company

Case Details

Full title:COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. MARBLEHEAD LAND COMPANY (a…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Dec 21, 1928

Citations

95 Cal.App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)
273 P. 138

Citing Cases

Detroit Edison Co. v. Janosz

Plaintiff cites a number of cases from other jurisdictions holding that statutory authorization for allowance…