Opinion
January 27, 2000
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered May 6, 1999, which granted defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 510(3) to change venue from New York to Richmond County, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the motion denied.
Thomas Torto, for plaintiff-appellant.
Marvin Ben-Aron, for defendant-respondent.
SULLIVAN, J.P., ROSENBERGER, NARDELLI, WILLIAMS, FRIEDMAN, JJ.
In this action for a trial de novo to determine defendant's entitlement to lost wages under no-fault, it was error to change venue from New York to Richmond County on the basis of an affidavit from defendant's attorney citing the fact that the three expected medical witnesses had their offices in Richmond County, as well as the fact that defendant's employer and her employment records were situated in that County. The affidavit fails to show that the prospective witnesses had been contacted and that they were available and willing to testify and the manner in which they would be inconvenienced by a trial in New York County. In the absence of such a showing, a change of venue on the ground of convenience of material witnesses, which is addressed to the sound discretion of the court (Pittman v. Maher, 202 A.D.2d 172), should not be granted. (Cardona v. Aggressive Heating, 180 A.D.2d 572.) Defendant failed to carry her burden so as to warrant a change of venue.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.