From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Counter v. Pub. Storage

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 6, 2022
2:19-cv-04792-AB (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-04792-AB (ASx)

01-06-2022

Shonna Counter, Plaintiff, v. Public Storage, a Real Estate Investment Trust; and DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

HON. ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 27, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Dkt. No. 39). A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than January 5, 2022. No. response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. 1


Summaries of

Counter v. Pub. Storage

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 6, 2022
2:19-cv-04792-AB (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Counter v. Pub. Storage

Case Details

Full title:Shonna Counter, Plaintiff, v. Public Storage, a Real Estate Investment…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-04792-AB (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2022)