From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coulter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 26, 1995
657 So. 2d 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2077.

March 15, 1995. Order Clarifying Decision April 26, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Paul Siegal, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Paul M. Gayle-Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.


This is an appeal from a criminal proceeding which resulted in a guilty verdict. We find that the trial court erred in overruling the defendant's peremptory challenge of a juror as the state did not make a proper objection to the peremptory strike in that it failed to demonstrate on the record that the challenged juror was a member of a distinctive racial group, and that there was a strong likelihood that the juror had been challenged solely on the basis of his race. Betancourt v. State, 650 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Portu v. State, 651 So.2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (on motion for clarification granted).

We note that these cases were decided subsequent to the trial in this matter.

Therefore, we reverse the adjudication and conviction under review and return the matter to the trial court for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.


On Motion To Clarify Granted


This is an appeal from a criminal proceeding which resulted in a guilty verdict. We find that the trial court erred in overruling the defendant's peremptory challenge of a juror as the state did not make a proper objection to the peremptory strike in that it failed to demonstrate on the record that the challenged juror was a member of a distinctive racial group, or that defendant had exercised said challenge in a racially discriminatory manner. Betancourt v. State, 650 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Portu v. State, 651 So.2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (on motion for clarification granted).

We note that these cases were decided subsequent to the trial in this matter.

Therefore, we reverse the adjudication and conviction under review and return the matter to the trial court for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Coulter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 26, 1995
657 So. 2d 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Coulter v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN COULTER, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 26, 1995

Citations

657 So. 2d 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)