From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coulter v. Mullins

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 7, 2005
No. CIV-05-610-C (W.D. Okla. Oct. 7, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV-05-610-C.

October 7, 2005


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by the United States Magistrate Judge on August 26, 2005. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and the Court orders as follows: (1) the Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is denied on the grounds of nonexhaustion; (2) this action is stayed pending the exhaustion of ground three and five of the six theories in ground four, and (3) the Oklahoma Attorney General is dismissed as a Respondent. Further, the Petitioner shall file a status report within thirty days showing state court proceedings have been initiated on the unexhausted claims and must request the reopening of this case within thirty days of the conclusion of the state court proceedings.

The Clerk shall administratively terminate this action in his records without prejudice to the rights of the Petitioner to reopen the proceeding any time within thirty days of the conclusion of state court proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Coulter v. Mullins

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 7, 2005
No. CIV-05-610-C (W.D. Okla. Oct. 7, 2005)
Case details for

Coulter v. Mullins

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE LAMAR COULTER, Petitioner v. MIKE MULLINS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 7, 2005

Citations

No. CIV-05-610-C (W.D. Okla. Oct. 7, 2005)

Citing Cases

Rhines v. Weber

See, e.g., Vasquez v. Parrott, 2005 WL 2864703 at *10 (S.D.N.Y. 2005); Hubbert v. Renico, 2005 WL 2173612 at…