From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coulson v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 7, 1912
127 P. 1090 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)

Opinion

No. A-1060.

Opinion Filed December 7, 1912.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

APPEAL — Review — Affirmance. When, upon appeal, it appears from the record that the offense charged against appellant was committed by him, and no error is disclosed depriving him of a substantial right during or prior to the trial, a judgment of conviction will not be reversed.

Appeal from Superior Court, Custer County; J.W. Lawter, Judge.

L.T. Coulson was convicted of violating the medical practice act, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Sol. L. Long and Jones Linville, for plaintiff in error.

Smith C. Matson and W.C. Reeves, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, L.T. Coulson, was tried and convicted in the superior court of Custer county at the December, 1910, term on a charge of violating the medical practice act, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50.

We have carefully gone over the record, and find no error sufficient to justify this court in interfering with the judgment of the court below.

The appeal is without merit, and the judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

FURMAN, P.J., and DOYLE, J., concur.


Summaries of

Coulson v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 7, 1912
127 P. 1090 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
Case details for

Coulson v. State

Case Details

Full title:L.T. COULSON v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 7, 1912

Citations

127 P. 1090 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
127 P. 1090

Citing Cases

Reeves v. State

30 Cyc. pp. 1547, 1548; 21 R.C.L. 368; Parks v. State, 159 Ind. 211, 64 N.E. 862, 59 L.R.A. 190; State v.…

Reeves v. State

This contention cannot be sustained. See Ex parte Ambler, 11 Okla. Cr. 449, 148 P. 1061; State Board of…