From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Couch v. Ahmed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-751 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-751

11-03-2014

HAROLD COUCH Plaintiff, v. FAISAL AHMED, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 5)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on October 6, 2014 submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 5). Plaintiff did not file objections.

As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly:

1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Rosie Clagg, Donald Morgan, Stuart Hudson, Gary Mohr, and the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 11/3/14

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Couch v. Ahmed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-751 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Couch v. Ahmed

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD COUCH Plaintiff, v. FAISAL AHMED, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-751 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2014)