Opinion
22-cv-10358
04-12-2023
Marissa Cotton, Plaintiff, v. Adrian College, Adrian College President and Board of Trustees, Kathy Morris in her official and individual capacity, and Katherine Crawford in her individual capacity, Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT KATHERINE CRAWFORD FOR FAILURE TO SERVE
JUDITH E. LEVY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On March 28, 2023, the Court entered an order adopting Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation, denying Plaintiff Marissa Cotton's objections, and granting Defendants Adrian College, Adrian College Board of Trustees, and Kathy Morris' motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 16.) The Court also ordered Plaintiff to show cause why Defendant Katherine Crawford should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (Id. at PageID.199.) On April 7, 2023, Plaintiff responded to the Court's order to show cause. (ECF No. 17.)
As the Court noted in its show cause order, Rule 4(m) provides that “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” (ECF No. 16, PageID.199 (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)).) “Absent a showing of good cause to justify a failure to effect timely service, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure compel dismissal.” Claybron v. Deangelo, No. 2:21-cv-11953, 2022 WL 5236843, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 25, 2022) (quoting Byrd v. Stone, 94 F.3d 217, 219 (6th Cir. 1996)), report and recommendation adopted, No. 21-cv-11953, 2022 WL 5199879 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 5, 2022). Here, Plaintiff states that “there is no reason why the action should not be dismissed against Katherine Crawford” and that the Court “should dismiss her as appropriate.” (ECF No. 17, PageID.201-202.)
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Defendant Katherine Crawford WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m).
IT IS SO ORDERED.